Synthetic Data & Simulation — Synthetic Data Generation Checklist

Interactive checklist to help teams decide whether to use synthetic data, choose appropriate generation methods and fidelity, run essential privacy and quality checks, and document governance, limitations, and next steps.

Interactive Tool

Synthetic Data Generation Checklist

This interactive checklist helps teams plan and evaluate synthetic datasets and simulations for experiments, model testing, product development, and operations. Use it to be explicit about purpose, required fidelity, privacy controls, validation steps, governance, and known limitations. Saving responses creates an auditable record you can revisit before moving toward production or real-data validation.

Short name so reviewers can trace this checklist to related artifacts.
Who is responsible for the dataset, testing, and follow-up actions.
YYYY-MM-DD or other convenient format.
Select the most important reason you’re generating synthetic data.
Short description if 'Other' was chosen above.
If yes, stronger validation and governance are required.
Choose the minimum acceptable realism for your experiments.
Multiple methods are common — record what you will use.
Be explicit — 'no controls' requires strong justification and governance.
Examples: nearest-neighbor comparisons, membership inference tests, MAE to real records.
Summarize test methods, key metrics, and pass/fail criteria. Attach artifacts to project records if available.
Consider KS tests, MMD, pairwise correlations, marginal distributions, and conditional behavior.
Record the metrics you used (e.g., KS p-values, MMD values) and the thresholds you consider acceptable.
Train/evaluate models on synthetic data and compare to real-data baselines where possible.
Summarize performance differences, failure modes, and whether synthetic results would change decisions.
Be explicit about scenarios where synthetic data is unreliable.
Examples: rare event frequencies, chained correlations, temporal drift, policy-sensitive fields.
Indicate whether privacy, legal, or domain governance reviews are complete.
1 = very low risk (safe experimentation only), 5 = high risk (could mislead production decisions).
1.0 10.0
If yes, record approver(s) in next field.
Names or roles expected to sign off (privacy, legal, product, ops).
Examples: real-data validation plan, additional leakage tests, governance sign-off, production pilot.
You can explore this tool now. Sign in or create an account to save your responses and return to them later.
Make this tool part of your work

Save a personal copy, bring it to your team, or tailor the questions and workflow to fit what you are hungry to improve.

Member customization and team collaboration are coming soon.

Discussion

Comments and conversation will live here.