CDS & Clinical AI Pilot Safety Checklist
A practical, clinician-centered pre-deployment and post-deployment checklist for safely piloting clinical decision support (CDS) and clinical AI. Includes concrete acceptance criteria, example metrics, monitoring guidance, rollback triggers, governance responsibilities, and a short pilot-plan template to make pilots deliberate, measurable, and traceable.
CDS & Clinical AI Pilot Safety Checklist
Use this checklist to structure a safe, human-centered pilot of clinical decision support or clinical AI. The list is intentionally practical: each item includes the expected evidence or acceptance criteria you should be able to point to before moving forward. Adapt items to local workflows, policy, and regulatory needs.
Pre-deployment (must be completed and documented before go‑live)
-
Clinical validation cases and acceptance criteria
Evidence: a curated set of representative positive, negative, and edge-case cases with expected outputs and clear pass/fail criteria. Acceptance criteria include sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV, calibration, or clinical outcome proxies appropriate to the use.
- Document the dataset, inclusion/exclusion rules, and why cases represent real-world use.
- Define minimum acceptable performance thresholds and failure modes that require stopping the pilot.
-
Integration test plan
Evidence: test scripts and results for EHR order flows, alerts, documentation, APIs, SSO, and data mapping.
- Confirm that orders/alerts fire in correct context and that suggested actions are recorded clearly in the chart.
- Confirm that timestamps, provenance, and tool version are logged with each recommendation.
-
Data privacy, security & auditability
Evidence: completed privacy impact assessment, data-sharing agreements, and security review (including logging and retention policies).
- Confirm telemetry and recommendation logs are retained for post-hoc review and RCA.
-
User training and communication plan
Evidence: short role-based training materials, script for launch communications, and clear guidance on when to accept, modify, or override suggestions.
- Explain the tool's intended use, known limitations, and how clinicians should document overrides.
-
Clinical governance & owner
Evidence: named clinical owner(s), escalation path, and approval from relevant committees (e.g., patient safety, informatics, legal).
-
Pilot scope and stopping rules
Evidence: clear scope (units, clinicians, patient cohorts), pilot duration, sample size targets, and explicit rollback/stop triggers.
- Example stop triggers: unanticipated increase in adverse events, >X% unexpected override rate with adverse outcomes, major data mapping failure, or clinically unacceptable drop in sensitivity for a key subgroup.
-
Monitoring plan (metrics & dashboards)
Evidence: list of performance metrics, sampling cadence, who monitors them, and how alerts are handled.
- Examples: alert volume, actionable rate, clinician acceptance/override rate, time-to-action, false positive/negative rates, subgroup performance, and downstream clinical outcomes when available.
-
Explainability & clinician-facing rationale
Evidence: one-line rationale for each recommendation, links to the underlying rule/logic/model version, and guidance for when to distrust the suggestion.
-
Testing for bias and subgroup performance
Evidence: analysis showing model/rule performance across relevant demographic and clinical subgroups, with planned mitigation if disparities are identified.
-
Incident response & escalation plan
Evidence: documented steps for responding to safety incidents, responsible parties, timelines for investigation, and how to communicate with affected patients and clinicians.
-
Regulatory & legal review
Evidence: confirmation that applicable regulatory reviews (e.g., FDA, local regulators), contracts, and consent requirements have been addressed or a plan exists to address them.
Deployment controls (day of go‑live)
- Limit initial rollout to a small controlled cohort (e.g., single unit, volunteer clinicians).
- Enable enhanced logging/telemetry and link logs to patient/context identifiers for follow-up reviews.
- Communicate and staff a rapid-response contact (on-call clinical lead) for the first 72 hours.
- Ensure clinicians can easily override recommendations and that overrides are logged with reason.
- Deploy feature flags / circuit breakers so the tool can be quickly turned off or scaled back without code changes.
Post-deployment monitoring & reviews
-
30/60/90-day safety reviews
Evidence: structured review notes covering quantitative metrics, qualitative clinician feedback, adverse events, and recommended changes. Each review should record decisions (continue, adjust, pause, or stop).
-
User feedback log
Evidence: a captured, time-stamped feedback log tied to users and cases (free-text plus structured tags). Triage process for safety-related feedback must be defined.
-
Drift detection and data-quality monitoring
Evidence: scheduled checks for data schema changes, distributional shifts, input missingness, and performance drift. Define thresholds that trigger investigation or rollback.
-
Periodic model/rule revalidation
Evidence: plan for revalidation cadence (e.g., quarterly) and when retraining or rule updates require a new pilot.
-
Audit & traceability
Evidence: ability to reconstruct the exact recommendation shown to a clinician (inputs, model/rule version, timestamps) for any patient encounter.
Acceptance criteria & examples
Define measurable acceptance criteria prior to starting the pilot. Examples:
- Alert positive predictive value >= 30% in the pilot cohort.
- Clinician override rate <= 40% for first 30 days without associated adverse event signal.
- No statistically significant drop in detection of condition X compared to baseline.
Quick pilot-plan template (copy & adapt)
Fill these fields before go-live:
- Pilot name: e.g., "Sepsis Early Warning Pilot - Med ICU"
- Scope: units/clinicians/patient criteria
- Start/End dates:
- Clinical owner: name and contact
- Success metrics: primary metric and 2 secondary metrics
- Stop/rollback triggers:
- Monitoring cadence: daily for first 7 days, then weekly
Example monitoring metrics
- Raw alert count per 100 encounters
- Actionable alert rate (alerts leading to clinical action)
- Clinician acceptance / override rate and documented reason
- Time-to-action following recommendation
- Model/rule performance by subgroup (age, sex, comorbidities)
- Number of incidents linked to the CDS/AI
Practical guidance & common pitfalls
- Aim for small, measurable pilots. Avoid full-scope launches without evidence.
- Track qualitative clinician stories alongside metrics — numbers alone miss workflow friction and safety signals.
- Make the rollback procedure fast and well-practiced; slow or bureaucratic rollbacks increase risk.
- Log every override with a short reason — aggregated reasons reveal systematic problems.
How to use this checklist
1) Before a pilot, complete the pre-deployment items and store evidence (test reports, approvals, training logs, validation datasets).
2) On go-live, enable logging, limit scope, and ensure a named on-call clinician is available.
3) Run structured 30/60/90 reviews and keep a persistent safety & feedback log. Use the acceptance criteria to make an evidence-based decision to expand, adjust, or stop.
Tip: Consider packaging this checklist into an interactive form or audit collection so teams can capture evidence, timestamps, and decisions directly in the system for future audits and learning.
Discussion
Comments and conversation will live here.