IIoT Readiness & Edge Architecture Checklist

An interactive, actionable checklist teams can use to validate asset inventories, network and segmentation, tag standards, edge processing, buffering, authentication, mappings, monitoring, and ownership before starting IIoT or MES integrations. Each item lets you record status, remediation notes, and owners so gaps become visible and traceable.

{ "Title": "IIoT Readiness & Edge Architecture Checklist", "IntroductionHtml": "

Use this checklist to validate the most common technical and organizational gaps that cause noisy or untrustworthy IIoT-to-MES/SCADA dataflows. For each item mark the current status, add remediation notes, and assign an owner. Save the checklist to create a record you can track and revisit.

", "SubmitLabel": "Save checklist", "SuccessMessage": "Checklist saved. Consider assigning remediation tasks and scheduling a follow-up review.", "DataType": "IIoTReadinessChecklistResponse", "SchemaVersion": "1.0", "Fields": [ { "Key": "asset_inventory_ok", "Label": "Is there a complete asset inventory with unique IDs, locations, and device types?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Inventory should include PLCs, RTUs, sensors, gateways, HMI nodes and responsible owner for each asset." }, { "Key": "asset_inventory_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for asset inventory", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "List missing items, data owners, and next steps (who will add/update records and by when)." }, { "Key": "network_segmentation_ok", "Label": "Is OT network segmented from IT and restricted to controlled gateways/VLANs?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Segmentation reduces risk and limits broadcast/noise. Verify firewalls, ACLs, and gateway policies." }, { "Key": "network_segmentation_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for network segmentation", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Describe gaps, devices bypassing segmentation, or required firewall rule changes." }, { "Key": "tag_naming_standard_ok", "Label": "Is there a documented tag naming and metadata standard applied consistently?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Standards should include tag IDs, descriptions, units, precision and lifecycle status." }, { "Key": "tag_naming_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for tag naming standards", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "List naming collisions, undocumented tags, or mapping actions required." }, { "Key": "timestamps_units_ok", "Label": "Are timestamps synchronized (NTP/PTP) and units standardized/recorded?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Inconsistent timestamps or units are a frequent source of analytic error. Check timezone handling, format and conversions." }, { "Key": "timestamps_units_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for timestamps and units", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Note systems out of sync, conversion rules to implement, or monitoring to enable." }, { "Key": "sampling_rates_ok", "Label": "Are sampling and reporting rates documented and matched to control and analytics needs?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Avoid over-sampling (noise, cost) and under-sampling (missed events). Document edge vs. historian rates." }, { "Key": "sampling_rates_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for sampling rates", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "List tags needing rate changes, expected new rates, and owners." }, { "Key": "edge_processing_defined", "Label": "Is the required edge processing defined (filtering, aggregation, smoothing, local alarms)?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Define which transformations happen at the edge vs. centrally and why." }, { "Key": "edge_processing_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for edge processing", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Specify missing functions, CPU/latency constraints, and deployment plan." }, { "Key": "buffering_strategy_ok", "Label": "Is edge buffering configured to handle network outages (durable queue, local storage)?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Buffering prevents data loss during outages and avoids time gaps in analytics." }, { "Key": "buffering_capacity_hours", "Label": "If buffering exists, how many hours of data can the edge safely buffer?", "FieldType": "number", "HelpText": "Enter an approximate number of hours." }, { "Key": "buffering_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for buffering strategy", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Describe gaps (e.g., insufficient local disk, no replay support) and mitigation steps." }, { "Key": "auth_mtls_ok", "Label": "Are devices and gateways authenticated (mutual TLS or equivalent) and credential lifecycle managed?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Device identity prevents impersonation and unauthorized data injection." }, { "Key": "auth_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for authentication", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Note unmanaged credentials, certificate expiry risks, and planned remediation." }, { "Key": "mes_mappings_ok", "Label": "Are MES/ERP mappings and semantic mappings for tags/messages documented and tested?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Document how raw signals map to MES data structures and business semantics." }, { "Key": "mes_mappings_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for MES/ERP mappings", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "List ambiguous mappings, missing semantic metadata, or required transformation rules." }, { "Key": "data_quality_monitoring_ok", "Label": "Is data quality monitoring in place (latency, loss rate, duplicates, drift, outliers)?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Monitoring builds trust. Track key signal health metrics and alerts." }, { "Key": "data_quality_metrics", "Label": "Which data-quality metrics are actively monitored?", "FieldType": "checkbox", "HelpText": "Select all that apply.", "Options": [ { "Value": "latency", "Label": "Latency" }, { "Value": "loss", "Label": "Missing data / Loss" }, { "Value": "duplicates", "Label": "Duplicates" }, { "Value": "drift", "Label": "Sensor drift / bias" }, { "Value": "outliers", "Label": "Outliers / implausible values" } ] }, { "Key": "data_quality_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for data quality monitoring", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Describe missing alerts, thresholds to add, or dashboards to create." }, { "Key": "ownership_sla_ok", "Label": "Is data ownership, access control, and SLAs defined for streams/tags?", "FieldType": "yesno", "HelpText": "Clarity on ownership prevents neglected data and unclear remediation responsibility." }, { "Key": "ownership_notes", "Label": "Remediation notes for ownership and SLAs", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "List owners to assign, SLA targets (latency, availability) and review cadence." }, { "Key": "overall_readiness", "Label": "Overall readiness rating", "FieldType": "scale", "HelpText": "Rate 1 (high risk) to 5 (ready for integration).", "Options": [ { "Value": "1", "Label": "1 - High risk" }, { "Value": "2", "Label": "2 - Significant gaps" }, { "Value": "3", "Label": "3 - Some gaps" }, { "Value": "4", "Label": "4 - Minor gaps" }, { "Value": "5", "Label": "5 - Ready" } ] }, { "Key": "final_comments", "Label": "Final comments and next steps", "FieldType": "textarea", "HelpText": "Summarize the highest-priority remediation actions, owners and target dates." } ] }

Discussion

Comments and conversation will live here.