Interactive, plant-ready calculator to capture task-level inputs for cobot/automation pilots so teams can estimate annual labor and quality savings, simple payback, and prepare numbers for NPV analysis.
{"Title":"Automation & cobot ROI calculator","IntroductionHtml":"
Quick plant-ready ROI tool for cobots and automation pilots
Enter task-level numbers below to capture a consistent dataset for evaluating automation pilots. This tool helps you estimate annual labor savings, quality-related savings, total annual benefit, simple payback period, and prepares inputs for NPV. These estimates are quick, local decision-support numbers — validate with engineering, safety, and procurement before committing capital.
What this form saves for you
- Stable, repeatable inputs for comparing candidate tasks
- Clear assumptions (labor burden, operating days, defect cost)
- Exportable data you can paste into a spreadsheet or feed into a calculation engine
Notes on interpretation
Outputs depend heavily on local assumptions: fully-burdened labor cost, whether automation replaces headcount or reallocates work, the true cost of defects, and integration effort. Use conservative assumptions for initial prioritization and then run a detailed engineering cost model for finalists.
","SubmitLabel":"Save inputs","SuccessMessage":"Inputs saved. Export or re-open to adjust values. To receive calculated results inside the platform, enable the calculation engine or export these inputs to your spreadsheet.","DataType":"automation-cobot-roi-inputs","SchemaVersion":"1.0","Fields":[{"Key":"labor_cost_per_hour","Type":"number","Label":"Operator fully-burdened labor cost ($/hour)","HelpText":"Include wages, benefits, payroll taxes, overtime, and overhead. If unknown, multiply base wage by 1.3–1.5.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"50"},{"Key":"time_per_task_seconds","Type":"number","Label":"Current cycle time per part or task (seconds)","HelpText":"Time to complete one cycle including handling, inspection, and movement.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"30"},{"Key":"tasks_per_shift","Type":"number","Label":"Average tasks completed per shift","HelpText":"Average number of task cycles completed in a single shift.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"200"},{"Key":"shifts_per_day","Type":"number","Label":"Shifts per day","HelpText":"Number of production shifts per day operating this task.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"1"},{"Key":"days_per_year","Type":"number","Label":"Operating days per year","HelpText":"Typically 250–365 depending on holidays and planned downtime.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"250"},{"Key":"current_defect_rate_pct","Type":"number","Label":"Current defect rate (%)","HelpText":"Percent of parts requiring rework or scrap currently.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"2"},{"Key":"cost_per_defect","Type":"number","Label":"Average cost per defect ($)","HelpText":"Include scrap cost, rework labor, materials, inspection time, and customer quality costs if relevant.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"30"},{"Key":"automation_capex","Type":"number","Label":"Automation CAPEX ($)","HelpText":"Purchase price of robot/cobot, end-of-arm tooling, fixtures, safety guarding, and primary hardware costs.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"50000"},{"Key":"automation_opex_annual","Type":"number","Label":"Automation annual OPEX ($)","HelpText":"Maintenance, consumables, license fees, and recurring costs per year.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"5000"},{"Key":"integration_costs","Type":"number","Label":"One-time integration & commissioning costs ($)","HelpText":"Systems integration, PLC changes, engineering hours, testing, and training required to bring the cell online.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"15000"},{"Key":"expected_throughput_gain_pct","Type":"number","Label":"Expected throughput change (%)","HelpText":"Percent change in throughput after automation. Use negative values if throughput will decrease.","Required":true,"Placeholder":"20"},{"Key":"expected_quality_gain_pct","Type":"number","Label":"Expected absolute reduction in defect rate (percentage points)","HelpText":"Enter the expected reduction in defect rate as absolute percentage points (e.g., enter 1 to represent a reduction from 3% to 2%).","Required":true,"Placeholder":"1"},{"Key":"labor_burden_multiplier","Type":"number","Label":"Labor burden multiplier","HelpText":"Factor to convert base wage into fully burdened cost (benefits, taxes, overhead). If unknown, use 1.35.","Required":false,"Placeholder":"1.35","Default":1.35},{"Key":"discount_rate_pct","Type":"number","Label":"Discount rate for NPV (%)","HelpText":"Use your cost of capital or corporate discount rate. Default 8% suggested.","Required":false,"Placeholder":"8","Default":8},{"Key":"analysis_years","Type":"number","Label":"Analysis period (years)","HelpText":"Typical useful-life ranges for cobot cells are 3–7 years. Use expected useful life for NPV.","Required":false,"Placeholder":"5","Default":5},{"Key":"notes","Type":"textarea","Label":"Notes or local adjustments","HelpText":"Document assumptions, local labor rules, overtime patterns, commissioning downtime, or risks that affect outcomes.","Required":false,"Placeholder":"e.g., 20% overtime, 4-week commissioning"}],"ExampleCalculationsHtml":"
Example (illustrative)
Assumptions: labor cost $40/hr, cycle 30s, tasks per shift 200, shifts 1, days 250, defect rate 2%, defect cost $30, capex $50k, integration $15k, opex $5k, throughput gain 20%, quality improvement 1 percentage point, analysis 5 years, discount 8%.
Key formulas (manual):
- Tasks per year = tasks_per_shift * shifts_per_day * days_per_year
- Time saved per task (hours) = current_cycle_time - (current_cycle_time / (1 + throughput_gain_pct/100)) all / 3600
- Annual labor hours saved = tasks_per_year * time_saved_per_task_hours
- Annual labor $ saved = annual_labor_hours_saved * labor_cost_per_hour
- Annual quality $ saved = tasks_per_year * (current_defect_rate_pct/100 - (current_defect_rate_pct/100 - expected_quality_gain_pct/100)) * cost_per_defect (approximate)
- Total annual benefit = labor_saved + quality_saved
- Total first-year cost = automation_capex + integration_costs + automation_opex_annual (or treat opex as recurring).
- Simple payback (years) = total_first_year_cost / total_annual_benefit (if annual benefit > 0).
- NPV requires discounting the stream of annual net benefits less recurring OPEX; use a spreadsheet or the platform calculation engine if available.
Illustrative result (from these assumptions): tasks/year = 200*1*250 = 50,000; approximate annual labor saving (with 20% faster cycle) ≈ $13,333; annual quality saving (1% of 50,000 * $30) = $15,000; total annual benefit ≈ $28,333; total first-year cost = $50,000 + $15,000 + $5,000 = $70,000; simple payback ≈ 2.5 years. (This example is illustrative only.)
","GuidanceHtml":"
How to use
- Complete this form for each candidate task so comparisons use the same assumptions.
- Export these inputs to your spreadsheet model or enable the platform calculation engine to compute payback and NPV automatically.
- For finalists, run a site engineering study including safety, cycle-time validation, takt analysis, and detailed integration quotes.
- Document who owns the data and who will maintain assumptions (owner, date).
Common pitfalls
- Underestimating integration and engineering costs — obtain quotes early.
- Confusing percent change vs percentage points for defect-rate improvements.
- Assuming automation eliminates headcount without accounting for redeployment costs or capacity needs.
"}