← Back to Research & Discovery
Assessments & audits center
Repeatable audits and checklists for reproducibility, data quality, safety, methods, and ethics—built to surface and prioritize improvement opportunities.
Assessments & audits center
Use structured, repeatable assessments to find what’s working, what’s at risk, and what to fix first—so teams can improve reproducibility, data integrity, safety, and methods with clear next steps.
Why structured assessments matter
In research and discovery, informal reviews or one‑off checklists often miss root causes, fail to produce clear ownership, or produce results that can’t be measured over time. Structured audits turn observation into usable information: they help teams compare current practice to agreed standards, reveal systemic gaps, and produce prioritized remediation items that can be assigned, tracked, and re‑assessed.
What you'll find here
This center collects practical, adaptable resources for common research hungers: reproducibility audits, data quality and governance checklists, methodological audit templates, and ethics/consent readiness packs suitable for IRB preparation. Each item is designed to be copied and tailored to your lab, project, or organization so it reflects local protocols, risk tolerances, and compliance needs.
How to use these resources in your work
Practical examples:
- A two‑person lab uses the reproducibility audit to map protocol drift and prioritize validation experiments before a grant submission.
- A clinical research team runs the consent & ethics checklist ahead of a multisite study to identify documentation gaps and IRB questions.
- A manufacturing R&D group applies the data quality audit to identify missing metadata fields that block downstream analysis and reporting.
Opportunities available on the platform: you can view or copy an audit as a starting template, convert static checklists into interactive forms so assessors can save answers, and store responses as structured JSON for later tracking, comparison, or export. Treat any copied audit as a living document—adapt the scope, scoring, and remediation actions to fit your organization.
How to avoid common assessment pitfalls
Design assessments to produce three outcomes: (1) clear evidence (what you observed), (2) an explicit gap or risk statement (what’s wrong or missing), and (3) a next step with an owner and timeline. Avoid audits that only produce scores without proposed actions, or that are applied without training and context. Tailor language and thresholds so assessors and lab staff interpret items consistently.
Next steps: Browse the checklist and audit library below, copy any item to your team space, or start with the reproducibility audit to see how a short, focused assessment surfaces immediate improvement opportunities.
Make useful resources part of something bigger.
The Hunger Engine is moving toward living domains, toolkits, and collections that people and organizations can explore, acquire, tailor, extend, and improve. A useful resource can become part of a personal collection, team toolbox, site-specific domain, or shared enterprise capability.
Start with what you're hungry to improve. As your needs grow, collections can bring together knowledge, audits, forms, dashboards, data, AI, integrations, and other capabilities without requiring you to start from scratch.