← Back to Research & Discovery
Reproducibility checklist library (audit companion)
Free, executable checklists to rapidly assess reproducibility gaps, capture findings, and prioritize remediation for labs and research teams.
Reproducibility checklist library (audit companion)
Use ready-made, executable checklists to rapidly find reproducibility gaps, capture structured evidence, assign ownership, and convert audit findings into prioritized remediation tasks.
What this library helps you do
This collection translates common reproducibility failure modes—poor record-keeping, untracked protocol changes, missing metadata, fragile analysis workflows—into concrete, actionable checks you can run today. Each checklist is designed to be checked, saved, and repeated so teams can compare results over time and focus scarce improvement effort where it matters most.
Practical examples: a bench scientist uses the Reproducible Analysis checklist to verify data provenance before a manuscript submission; a computational team runs the executable checklist before releasing analysis code; a clinical lab runs the Reproducibility & Quality Checklist as part of pre-study readiness reviews.
How to use it in your workflow
Start by selecting a checklist that matches your weakest link (data handling, protocol control, analysis reproducibility). Copy or adopt it for your team, tailor the items to local tools and standards, and assign owners for each remediation action. For repeatability, record responses and notes so future audits track improvement trends and unresolved risks.
Where helpful, convert static checks into interactive forms to capture structured answers (yes/no, notes, severity, owner). Structured data makes it easier to prioritize fixes, generate simple reports, and feed improvement huddles or follow-up audits aligned with the parent Reproducibility & Quality Audit template.
Who benefits
Researchers, laboratory managers, data scientists, QA staff, reproducibility stewards, and small research teams will find immediate value. The library is also useful for service labs, academic groups preparing submissions, product development teams validating analyses, and compliance or quality professionals who need repeatable checks tied to remediation ownership.
What to watch out for
Checklist-driven improvement only works when audits produce actions: avoid checklists that are never assigned, never updated, or never measured. Tailor items to your context—don’t use a generic list as a substitute for investigating root causes. Save findings, track ownership, and schedule follow-ups to close the loop.
Make useful resources part of something bigger.
The Hunger Engine is moving toward living domains, toolkits, and collections that people and organizations can explore, acquire, tailor, extend, and improve. A useful resource can become part of a personal collection, team toolbox, site-specific domain, or shared enterprise capability.
Start with what you're hungry to improve. As your needs grow, collections can bring together knowledge, audits, forms, dashboards, data, AI, integrations, and other capabilities without requiring you to start from scratch.